Australia’s Next Top Model, Cycle 4: A model example?

Whilst BNTM continues to progress at a snail’s pace i.e. weekly, I’m rapidly making my way through every other English-speaking cycle in the Next Top Model franchise.

As you’ll already know, I rated AusNTM Cycle 5 rather highly. Alas, whilst Cycle 4 offered no punching of walls, swearing at end of catwalks or stealing of lines, it did have a huge bullying controversy and a thoroughly undeserving winner to recommend it – if recommend is the word! Winner Demelza Reveley may have had the flowery name and golden good looks of a Disney Princess, but what a horrid creature she was. Ringleader of the self-named ‘Bitchketeers’ (how dumb must you be to give yourself such a name knowing you’re being filmed), she sniped away unpleasantly at fellow finalist Alexandra Girdwood throughout the entire run and together with her minions, made life a living hell for contestant Alamela Rowan whilst giving simpering butter-wouldn’t-melt-in-mouth VTs. [Alamela was a bit of an oddity anyway – with her alarming poise, pale skin, sing-song voice and penchant for bursting into operatic arias, she had the air of a possessed child from a horror film.]

Quite how Demelza managed to reach the final, let alone win, remains to be seen (she also had a string of vacant-looking photos and fat hips which she did nothing about, even when another girl, Caris, was continuously badgered about her body) – especially as the final of AusNTM is partially decided by public vote. Perhaps it was because she was up against Alex, whose main claim to fame that series had been deliberately fattening up the rest of the girls with calorie-loaded muffins (pure brilliance!). She also had collagen implants, meaning her lips stayed put even when she’d left the room hours ago, a strong editorial look that didn’t always work for other shoots and was clearly more fashion-savvy and intelligent than your average NTM contestant, easily running circles around the Bitchketeers in any arguments. Or perhaps it was because of the blatant favouritism shown by host, Jodhi Meares – herself the cause of controversy for being the only head judge with credentials as a glamour model, being unable to talk without a huge red clipboard of prompts and having a last-minute freak-out which meant she didn’t present the live final and was never seen or talked about in NTM ever again.

But onto the pretty things – the photos. You already know about my love for Russell James so unsurprisingly, I’m a fan of these beach shots. I think more could have been made of the setting, yet I love the intensity he gets out of the girls. These photos have a beautiful warmth and innocence to them, with their eyes completely connecting with the camera. Who knows how much Photoshop goes into these things, but the way James captures the light, depth and glitter to models’ eyes is totally arresting. This, incidentally, is Demelza’s best photo – it wasn’t even shown on the show and is supposed to be advertising swimwear, so make of that what you will! (top to bottom: Sam, Demelza, Alex, Caris)

My other favourite shoot this season was by Simon Upton, where the girls modelled shoes whilst being harnessed to the side of a tall building. The styling here is fantastic – I love the bright colours and fluorescent make-up, which complements the dynamic energy of the poses. With such great styling and the dramatic cityscape background, the girls really didn’t have to do much (well, if you count bouncing off a wall at a 90 degree angle wearing stiletto heels and with a harness digging into you as not much). The top banner picture, which has an amazing movement to it, is of Leiden, the butch bogan of the series, who was always ‘shittin’ bricks’ and having frequent meltdowns and made for very good viewing too. Also shown are (top to bottom) are Sam, Alex and Caris – I’m still in two minds over Caris’ photo, as she either looks like a serene fallen angel or just a corpse, but at least it’s interesting, which is more than I can say for Demelza’s efforts.

I mentioned that the girls didn’t have to do much for Upton’s shoot – and Demelza certainly did just that. Not much. This photo has the air of the crew tidying up for the day and realising ‘Shit – we left a girl up there!’ Alas, Reveley was not left out to dry but had merely slipped whilst bouncing about. Never mind that by being flat-out horizontal, she ruins the proportions of the photo – the model should be the focus, not somehow hanging like a bat on the peripheries and only noticeable because of her colourful quilt-thing. The very thing she’s supposed to be selling (the shoes) barely make the frame! Oh well, at least the skyline looks nice.

Here’s the Russell James shot that was chosen for the show. I’d find it vaguely inoffensive if Jodhi Meares hadn’t suddenly started orgasming and having babies over it – made doubly awful by the fact that the girls were modelling her bikinis and so she had the sway of being the client too. Her posture’s awful, her eyes are vacant, she looks generally gormless and the whole thing’s just blah, lacking the intensity of the rest of the James’ shots. And as my boyfriend pointed out, the pose that Meares went gaga for was stolen from Willy The Wimp, a character I had no idea even existed before I was forced to Google Image to verify my boyfriend’s claims. And now, I can’t see this photo without thinking of a shy-looking monkey. Willy The Wimp for first call-out!

10 responses to “Australia’s Next Top Model, Cycle 4: A model example?

  1. Unearthed your webblog via bing the other day and absolutely think its great. Carry on the excellent work.

  2. Haha I totally forgot about Willy the Wimp until I saw this!

  3. i just recently caught reruns of australiasntm cycle 4 and i could not believe the bullying- such nastiness!! i wanted to go an slap dumbelza-and make her cry and then i found out she wins!! WTH?! shes so ordinary and blah! more like bletch- boooring!
    but good read i quite enjoyed that.

    • Hey Sara

      Thx for the comment! I still find it pretty amazing that Demelza won, esp as the public got to vote too! Ugh, not only was she a nasty piece of work, she wasn’t even the best model either!

      Glad you enjoyed my piece and you should definitely check out the other seasons of AusNTM if you get the chance (I have write-ups for 1-5 if you want to see what’s in store!). Season 4 is my least fave!

  4. ooo ill definitely check them out- will watch them and then read ur write-ups

  5. Hey Rach :), I didn’t want Demelza to win, I don’t think she deserved to win, there were way better models than her.
    I think Alex should have won.
    Anyway I love reading your write-ups!! 🙂

    • Hey Tine!

      Thanks for commenting!

      Ugh, Demelza! I don’t think Alex was great by any means but anyone was better than Demelza! I’m so surprised she won, especially with the public voting too, and I love that the editor of Vogue refused to put her on the front!

      So happy you enjoy my write-ups, I’ve done every season of AusNTM and a few others, they’re all here for whenever you finish a season (https://rachttlg.wordpress.com/tag/next-top-model/), I’d love to hear your comments for each one!

      Rach
      x

  6. Im glad australian vogue chose not to feature her.

    • Australian Vogue did feature Demelza when she won – contractually, an 8-page spread with them was part of the prize. However, Vogue editor at the time Kirstie Clements did not put her on the cover, like she did with last season’s winner Alice Burdeu, and Clements voted for Alex to win at the final citing concerns about Demelza’s behaviour. In her autobiography, Clements describes the ensuing controversy as being “off-brand” for Vogue; Vogue and AusNTM parted company after that cycle and future cycles featured a prize with Harper’s Bazaar instead.

Talk to me, people! Leave a comment below...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.